Thursday, August 21, 2008
SOMERVILLE, Mass. - Plans to build a new Orange Line transit station with the help of private sector funds would likely get a boost under a plan to reform the nation's surface transportation programs, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters announced during a visit to the city today.
The Secretary said that under the new plan, state and local officials would have significantly greater resources and flexibility to design, finance and complete meritorious projects. She noted that as a result, projects like the new station would have an easier time getting built under the new plan than they would under today's approach to transportation projects.
"If this station is as good as local sponsors say it is, it will get reviewed, cleared and funded more easily and more rapidly under our plan than under the current broken federal system," Secretary Peters said. "Getting traffic moving in our largest cities must be a priority, not a pain."
The Secretary said central to the reform plan is a new Metropolitan Mobility Program for Boston and other major urban areas with populations over half a million people. The program would give mayors and local officials a direct payment of federal funds and unprecedented flexibility to invest the federal dollars in their most pressing transportation needs, whether it is expanding transit systems or new highways, she said.
"Cities like Boston shouldn't have to pray for earmarks or plead for niche grants simply to get commuters moving again," Secretary Peters said. "Our plan fixes that by making urban congestion a priority and giving local leaders the money and flexibility they need to get traffic flowing again."
Instead of having to slice and dice federal dollars to qualify for many different niche programs with a tangle of different rules, the Secretary said, Boston's leaders would receive one lump federal funding allocation with one overarching criteria - that the projects stand up to a benefit-cost analysis. She said projects that can demonstrate positive results for commuters and good investments for taxpayers would be rewarded, instead of the current system that rewards rampant earmarks, political muscle and bridges to nowhere.
As part of the focus on urban congestion, the reform plan also provides incentives for innovation in cities, like Boston, willing to try something new. The plan would create a Metropolitan Innovation Fund that rewards cities willing to combine a mix of effective transit investments, dynamic pricing of highways and new traffic technologies.
"We want to make it easier for communities like this to generate funds for other, equally ambitious new transit and highway projects," Secretary Peters said.
The Secretary said the plan lays out the Administrations' reform framework, and is intended to spur local, state and federal debate about how best to incorporate the new reforms into surface transportation legislation Congress will consider this fall. Additional details on the reform plan are available at www.fightgridlocknow.gov.
The Secretary said that under the new plan, state and local officials would have significantly greater resources and flexibility to design, finance and complete meritorious projects. She noted that as a result, projects like the new station would have an easier time getting built under the new plan than they would under today's approach to transportation projects.
"If this station is as good as local sponsors say it is, it will get reviewed, cleared and funded more easily and more rapidly under our plan than under the current broken federal system," Secretary Peters said. "Getting traffic moving in our largest cities must be a priority, not a pain."
The Secretary said central to the reform plan is a new Metropolitan Mobility Program for Boston and other major urban areas with populations over half a million people. The program would give mayors and local officials a direct payment of federal funds and unprecedented flexibility to invest the federal dollars in their most pressing transportation needs, whether it is expanding transit systems or new highways, she said.
"Cities like Boston shouldn't have to pray for earmarks or plead for niche grants simply to get commuters moving again," Secretary Peters said. "Our plan fixes that by making urban congestion a priority and giving local leaders the money and flexibility they need to get traffic flowing again."
Instead of having to slice and dice federal dollars to qualify for many different niche programs with a tangle of different rules, the Secretary said, Boston's leaders would receive one lump federal funding allocation with one overarching criteria - that the projects stand up to a benefit-cost analysis. She said projects that can demonstrate positive results for commuters and good investments for taxpayers would be rewarded, instead of the current system that rewards rampant earmarks, political muscle and bridges to nowhere.
As part of the focus on urban congestion, the reform plan also provides incentives for innovation in cities, like Boston, willing to try something new. The plan would create a Metropolitan Innovation Fund that rewards cities willing to combine a mix of effective transit investments, dynamic pricing of highways and new traffic technologies.
"We want to make it easier for communities like this to generate funds for other, equally ambitious new transit and highway projects," Secretary Peters said.
The Secretary said the plan lays out the Administrations' reform framework, and is intended to spur local, state and federal debate about how best to incorporate the new reforms into surface transportation legislation Congress will consider this fall. Additional details on the reform plan are available at www.fightgridlocknow.gov.
posted by transport blogs @ 10:09 PM permanent link | Post a Comment |